Henry Moore at Tate Britain reviewed by RA Magazine

Had he survived a little longer he would have been the first living artist ever to have occupied the whole of the RA’s magisterial main galleries, an extraordinary honour, perhaps the more so given that he had never become an Academician. He had however, accepted the Order of Merit in 1963, as well as becoming a Companion of Honour in 1955, and there is no doubt that by the last decade or so of his career Moore had become a cosy establishment figure who produced ‘respectful yawns in right-thinking partisans of avant-garde art,’ as one commentator put it.

Since then, we have all grown accustomed to seeing Moore’s decorous blobs adorning plazas, public buildings and landscapes. But it is worth reminding ourselves of how radical his early work was. His second solo show in London, at the Leicester Galleries in 1931, in which he unveiled his full strength as a sculptor, brought a storm of execration. He was accused of ‘revolting formlessness’ and of promoting ‘a cult of ugliness’ and, so dangerous was his influence deemed, he lost his teaching post at the Royal College of Art, where the head of Sculpture and the Old Students’ Association ganged up to force him out. But the people who loathed his early work had good reason to, from their own point of view. They clearly sensed, and recoiled from, Moore’s willingness to deal with the darker forces of the human psyche, those of Eros and Thanatos – death and the erotic.

They were also averse to his presentation of the human body as anxious, anguished and instinctual. Of course there were critics who understood and admired all this – the late David Sylvester for one – but I am nevertheless amazed and delighted that Tate Britain is now devoting a major exhibition to the early, subversive work of such a national treasure, although I am also tempted to ask, ‘What took you so long?’ In a compelling catalogue essay, the show’s curator Chris Stephens draws attention to Moore’s experiences as a soldier in the First World War, during which he survived a gas attack, and by the end was one of only 52 left alive from his battalion of 400.

Moore’s subsequent work, he argues, ‘spoke of and to the crisis of civilisation that was felt to have followed the War,’ as well as being ‘close to the fresh ideas of the body and sex supported by the new vogue for psychoanalysis.’ All this indeed comes out in sculpture after sculpture in which Moore tapped the depths of his unconscious, and which speak with a primitivist, raw and disturbing power, directly from the mind of the artist to that of the viewer. At the same time they show high technical refinement and great beauty of surface.